#7560: len(t_span) > 2 case creates len(t_span) - 1 solutions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: adavid | Owner: jkantor
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: ode_solver, ode_solve, t_span | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Timo Kluck
Authors: Jan Medlock | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Changes (by tkluck):
* reviewer: => Timo Kluck
Comment:
> I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I believe what I've
written is exactly correct.
I'm sorry, you're right. I think the `elif` condition needs to be changed
to `>= 2` as you suggest, even though I realize it's technically a
different issue. If we don't, this will really bite people.
> As for what to do if len(self.t_span) > 2 and num_points is defined, I
think the best thing to do is to use the values in self.t_span and ignore
num_points.
I agree.
> I personally find points more natural than intervals in this setting,
I'll trust your judgment since I haven't actually used this.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7560#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
