#11576: make it possible to generate sequences of variables easily
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: Cernay2012 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Replying to [comment:16 mjo]:
> Replying to [comment:15 kcrisman]:
> > Is it `a_1_{2_3}` or `a_{123}`? I guess I was thinking of subscripts
of subscripts. Maybe that's not at issue here; I can't quite reconstruct
my thinking then either. Wasn't there some nesting somewhere in your
patch?
>
> It's `a_{1)_{2}_{3}`. To create `a_{123}`, you'd call `a[123]`. There is
nesting going on, but each "level" should be separated by an underscore
now. In fact now that we're only accepting the square brackets, I think
commas should map directly to underscores. For example,
>
So how would you distinguish {{{a_(1,2_3)}}} from {{{a_(1_2,3)}}} - or is
that not at issue? That's what I was getting at, I think.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11576#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
