#11576: make it possible to generate sequences of variables easily
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: Cernay2012 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> Neither of those are directly constructible. It might be useful to make
the bijection in your head, but `a_{1}_{2}_{3}` is all that my patch
allows you to create. The user assigns alternate semantics at his own risk
=)
Okay, so there is only {{{a_(1,2,3)}}} and {{{a_(12,3)}}} and
{{{a_(123)}}} and friends, everything at one level.
I'd probably be okay with this then, but I'd really like some input from
Burcin and/or Florent as to how compatible this might be with
''eventually'' using Ginac's capabilities. I would view doing this
natively as a temporary measure. For instance, have you checked how this
performs with respect to Nils' comment about memory usage?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11576#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
