#13077: generalised Tamari lattices
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: chapoton | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: poset | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Frédéric Chapoton | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by stumpc5):
Replying to [comment:11 chapoton]:
Hi Fred,
I attached a review patch containing several improvements (hopefully) for
the doc strings. Beside that, I think the patch is ready to go. I though
have two remaining questions:
- I think you should mention that the generalised Tamari lattice is only
conjectured to be a lattice (there is at least no publicly available
source of a proof).
- You are mixing British English ("nonnegative") and American English
("generalised"): I think it would be nice to make this consistent, and to
actually check if "generalised/generalized" is already used in other
placed in Sage to keep consistency here.
Cheers, Christian
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13077#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
