#21: command line option parsing
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: jdemeyer
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.0
Component: interfaces | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: #9958 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* owner: mabshoff => jdemeyer
Comment:
Going with `argparse` is probably a good idea, but I would still like a
special "pre-parser" in `bash` to handle to options
{{{
sage --sh
sage -i
sage -f
}}}
(or whatever version they will become)
I think these must be available from the start, before Python has been
built.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/21#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
