#21: command line option parsing
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: jdemeyer
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.0
Component: interfaces | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: #9958 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Given that part of the startup needs to be `bash` anyway (I actually think
`bash` is a good language to implement `sage-env`), perhaps the two-pass
argument parsing (as proposed in the comments of 3 years ago) would be
best. Have a small `sage` script written in `bash` which processes just a
few options and when options aren't recognized, run all the Python
`argparse` machinery. What could be the problem with that?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/21#comment:44>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
