#14017: Determine the correct argspec for python functions defined in cython
files
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: jason
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: introspection cython argspec | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Here is some other doctest that currently has a very odd result. The docs
say that "In the case of a class or a class instance, the ``ArgSpec`` of
the ``__new__`` or ``__init__`` methods are returned". The example is
{{{
sage: P.<x,y> = QQ[]
sage: sage_getargspec(P)
ArgSpec(args=['self', 'element'], varargs=None, keywords=None,
defaults=None)
sage: sage_getargspec(P.__class__)
ArgSpec(args=['self', 'element'], varargs=None, keywords=None,
defaults=None)
}}}
but in fact we have
{{{
sage: sage_getargspec(P.__init__)
ArgSpec(args=['self', 'base_ring', 'n', 'names', 'order'], varargs=None,
keywords=None, defaults=("'degrevlex'",))
}}}
and thus the expected answer looks suspicious to me.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14017#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
