#14017: Determine the correct argspec for python functions defined in cython
files
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: jason
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: introspection cython argspec | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Simon King', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Simon King
Comment:
At [ sage-devel], Robert Bradshaw confirmed that it is probably best to
pre-process the source code of a cython function definition, by letting
`_sage_getargspec_cython` first remove the argument's type definition and
then call `_sage_getargspec_from_ast`.
In addition to that, I think for consistency `_sage_getargspec_cython`
should return an `ArgSpec` and not a plain tuple.
Needs review!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14017#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
