#11892: Extend singular_function to non-commutative polynomial rings by
refactoring
of plural
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: #4539 | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by PolyBoRi):
Sorry, I do not have the time to check anything in detail now.
I was a little bit surprised that the ticket is still open.
I am sure that the functionality worked before.
You can use a common base class, if you want.
But inheriting the noncommutative ring from the commutative seems
absolutely the wrong way to go.
Still abstractions like {{{is_sage_wrapper_for_singular_ring}}} seem
unavoidable to me.
Thank for all your efforts (very appreciated) and my strong opinion
without being able to dive into the topic again.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11892#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
