#8392: Check when defining a permutation by one-line notation (list of int)
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
       Reporter:  nborie                      |         Owner:  tscrim    
           Type:  defect                      |        Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major                       |     Milestone:  sage-5.7  
      Component:  combinatorics               |    Resolution:            
       Keywords:  permutation, check, days38  |   Work issues:            
Report Upstream:  N/A                         |     Reviewers:            
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw            |     Merged in:            
   Dependencies:                              |      Stopgaps:            
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Travis Scrimshaw', 'oldvalue': ''}):

  * keywords:  permutation, check, assert, days38 => permutation, check,
               days38
  * author:  => Travis Scrimshaw


Old description:

> Just check the user give a good entry and for that move a method
> (robinson_schensted)
>
> For now, sage accept that:
> {{{
> sage: Permutation([1,1,1,1,1])
> [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
> sage: Permutation([-12,1,3])
> [-12, 1, 3]
> }}}

New description:

 Since the user is currently very strongly encouraged to use good
 formatting in #13742, there is no longer a good way to do certain methods
 which were more designed for words (ex. `robinson_schensted()`)

 Before, sage would accept that:
 {{{
 sage: Permutation([1,1,1,1,1])
 [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
 sage: Permutation([-12,1,3])
 [-12, 1, 3]
 }}}

 This ticket plans to separate out the `RSK` into a global function which
 takes various types of input and runs the row insertion and also does the
 same for the inverse. This ticket might also have permutations inherit
 from `Word`.

--

Comment:

 I'm going to recycle this ticket due to #13742.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8392#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to