#5513: [with new patch, needs review (again)] Enhanced support for number field
unit groups
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  cremona        |       Owner:  was                    
     Type:  enhancement    |      Status:  new                    
 Priority:  major          |   Milestone:  sage-3.4.1             
Component:  number theory  |    Keywords:  number field unit group
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by cremona):

 Replying to [comment:22 cremona]:
 > ok -- see newest patch (units_rebased3.patch, to replace
 units_rebased2.patch).
 >
 > I took the lazy way out and added #random to all the outputs which
 return actual units.  It may be a 32/64 issue, but not just that since
 when testing this patch on one machine I kept on getting different
 generating units out of pari.  I seem to remember that there is a way to
 "reset" pari in doctests  to avoid this random-ness.
 >
 > Mathematically this is not so unreasonable since any f.g. abelian group
 will lots (infinitely many) sets of generators and there is no way to pick
 one canonically.  (William and I thought about this for elliptic curve
 generators and came up against an unsolved problem which prevents this
 being possible even in principle!).

 Michael,

 since all I did here was to add #random to the problem tests, does this
 need more review or could it be merged now?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5513#comment:23>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to