sage-trac  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style pip package sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style pip package sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style pip package sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style package sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style package sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19775: normalization in Pynac buggy sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19775: normalization in Pynac buggy sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #18386: fix polylog evalf sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #18386: fix polylog evalf sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #18386: fix polylog evalf sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21075: checksums mismatch for libhomfly sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21054: Transition between bases is incorrect for Moebius algebras sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21054: Transition between bases is incorrect for Moebius algebras sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21054: Transition between bases is incorrect for Moebius algebras sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #10615: Clarify and unify plotting options sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21074: Document additional options for Text graphics primitives sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21074: Document additional options for Text graphics primitives sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21074: Document additional options for Text graphics primitives sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21074: Document additional options for plot/text.py sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21074: Document additional options for plot/text.py sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21074: Document additional options for plot/text.py sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #14821: Weird error in exponential integral sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #14821: Weird error in exponential integral sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #14821: Weird error in exponential integral sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #14821: Weird error in exponential integral sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19435: Poset documentation polishing: New posets from old ones sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19435: Poset documentation polishing: New posets from old ones sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19435: Poset documentation polishing: New posets from old ones sage-trac
• [sage-trac] [Sage] Trac password reset for user: A.Alharbi sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21060: wrong parent for q_catalan numbers sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21073: remove a suggestion to move Sage tree from docs sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21072: Beta-adic tools for linux sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20154: train-tracks sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20154: train-tracks sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20154: train-tracks sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20154: train-tracks sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21071: substitution in denomintor is skipped sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21070: comparison with wildcard raises error sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21069: comparison of permutation and list: unexpected result sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21069: comparison of permutation and list: unexpected result sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21068: O(x) equals zero in PowerSeriesRing sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21068: O(x) equals zero in PowerSeriesRing sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_li8st() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor_list() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21067: Symbolic factor() should do integer factorisation of integers/rationals sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21066: Unpickle overrides for finite fields sage-trac
  • [sage-trac] #21066: Unpickle overrides for finite fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21066: Unpickle overrides for finite fields sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21065: Improve pickling error handling sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21065: Improve pickling error handling sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21065: Improve pickling error handling sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21065: Improve pickling error handling sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21065: Improve pickling error handling sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21065: Improve pickling error handling sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20227: Chow form for projective subschemes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20227: Chow form for projective subschemes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20227: Chow form for projective subschemes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20227: Chow form for projective subschemes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20227: Chow form for projective subschemes sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #13368: plot(x, xmax=1, xmin=-1) comes up empty sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20041: Shifted tableaux sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20041: Shifted tableaux sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21064: Enable NTL's '-march=native' more cautiously sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21063: Add xz package (prerequisite for autotools) sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21062: How to store information on codes build from other ones sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21062: How to store information on codes build from other ones sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21062: How to store information on codes build from other ones sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21062: How to store information on codes built from other ones sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21061: typos and index for strongly_regular_db sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21061: typos and index for strongly_regular_db sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21060: wrong parent for q_catalan nunmbers sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21060: wrong parent for q_catalan nunmbers sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21060: wrong parent for q_catalan numbers sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21060: wrong parent for q_catalan numbers sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21060: wrong parent for q_catalan numbers sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19203: hold for limit sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20888: Support GinacFunction._print_latex_() customization sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20888: Support GinacFunction._print_latex_() customization sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20888: Support GinacFunction._print_latex_() customization sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #16325: implicit_plot does not handle color parameter properly sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15134: HyperbolicFunction can't handle Python complex input sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15134: HyperbolicFunction can't handle Python complex input sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15134: HyperbolicFunction can't handle Python complex input sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15134: HyperbolicFunction can't handle Python complex input sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21059: Change WithRealizations._an_element_ to use a_realization sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21059: Change WithRealizations._an_element_ to use a_realization sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21059: Change WithRealizations._an_element_ to use a_realization sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21059: Change WithRealizations._an_element_ to use a_realization sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20928: eclib fails to build with gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20563: Cannot compile SnapPy for sage because sage's gcc is incompatible with system's as sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20779: NTL 9.8.1 does not build on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9, nor CentOS 6.8 sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21058: get rid of one sort using cmp in totally real fields sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21057: Assumption ignored in indefinite integral computation sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21056: some doc correction in modular folder sage-trac

• Earlier messages
• Later messages