#13387: Improve MonoDict and TripleDict data structures
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: nbruin | Owner: Nils Bruin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-feature
Component: memleak | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nils Bruin | Merged in:
Dependencies: #11521, #12313 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:15 nbruin]:
> Hm. Seems `MonoDict` had a `_get_buckets` method with a doctest
referring to `TripleDict`. Since both `MonoDict` and `TripleDict` now have
cdef `get` and `set` methods with incompatible signatures, we cannot have
`TripleDict` inherit from `MonoDict` anymore,
I think this is why I originally dropped get/set for `MonoDict`.
What about having different names for the getters and setters (mget/mset
versus tget/tset)? It would avoid the duplication, but would certainly not
be very clean.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13387#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
