#12415: Update doctesting framework
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: robertwb
| Owner: jdemeyer
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_work
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: doctest
| Resolution:
Keywords:
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: David Roe, Robert Bradshaw
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #13147,#13146, #13145, #12723, #12392, #12393, #12395,
#12396, #12397, #12381, #12382, #12383, #12384, #11871, #13195, #13121, #13748,
#13899, #12719, #5155, #14070, #14079 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by roed):
Replying to [comment:189 jdemeyer]:
> I noticed a change in behaviour and I'm wondering whether it is
intentional.
>
> Old doctesting framework outputs like:
> {{{
> sage -t file.py
> <messages>
> [4.1 s]
> }}}
>
> New doctesting framework outputs like:
> {{{
> <messages>
> sage -t file.py
> [1 test, 1 failure, 1.7 s]
> }}}
>
> I dislike the last way of outputting, especially in `--verbose` mode,
because there is no mention of what file is being tested. You see:
> {{{
> Running doctests with ID 2013-02-13-12-55-39-de348564.
> Doctesting 1 file.
> Trying (line 2): cython('sig_on()')
> Expecting nothing
> ok [1.61 s]
> ...
> }}}
> "line 2" of which file?...
Adding the number of tests and number of failures was intentional (to
which I assume you don't object). The change in order is an artifact of
the code that delayed printing. When there are lots of processes running
parallel, you can't output
{{{
sage -t file.py
}}}
at the before starting testing, since the messages will get mixed up. I
agree that the line describing which file is being tested should come at
the beginning.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12415#comment:190>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
