#14161: add a _test_antipode method for Hopf algebras
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: saliola | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.8
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: hopf algebras | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Franco Saliola | Merged in:
Dependencies: #14162, #14163 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment (by chrisjamesberg):
I vote to keep as a Hopf algebra! If you call something a Hopf algebra, do
you have to implement the antipode? Isn't "Not implemented" acceptable?
It's still a Hopf algebra even if it doesn't know how to compute the
antipode.
I think the description of this ticket could be a little more informative
than just a few doctests. Without reading the code, I'm not exactly sure
what this ticket is about.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14161#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
