#14284: Sampling in unit tests
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  roed         |         Owner:  jason          
           Type:  enhancement  |        Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major        |     Milestone:  sage-5.9       
      Component:  misc         |    Resolution:                 
       Keywords:               |   Work issues:                 
Report Upstream:  N/A          |     Reviewers:  Julian Rueth   
        Authors:  David Roe    |     Merged in:                 
   Dependencies:  #14285       |      Stopgaps:                 
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Hi!

 Sorry to jump in a bit late in the discussion; I had not noticed this
 ticket before.

 I definitely see and approve the point of the ticket. On the other hand, I
 find the current idiom to be used in {{{_test_associativity}}} and friends
 a bit heavy. What about an idiom like:

 {{{
     S = tester.some_elements()
     for x,y,z in tester.some_elements(CartesianProduct(S,S,S)):
         ...
 }}}

 It's short, and encapsulate TestSuite's inner logic for testing strategies
 (on how many elements to run the tests, whether to do tests at random or
 not, ...).

 This of course requires implementing:
 {{{
 tester.some_elements(XXX)
 }}}

 The default implementation could be to run XXX.some_elements(). Or iterate
 through XXX, stopping if there are more than n_max elements. Or take a
 sample if XXX implements sample. Or ...

 What do you think? If you agree, then I would suggest doing the changes in
 this ticket, in order to minimize changes and counter changes (they
 probably will require some rebasing of my upcoming category patches; the
 less rebasing the better :-)).

 By the way: for reproducibility of test failures, I am not super
 comfortable with random testing as a default; but that might be just me.

 Cheers,
                                    Nicolas

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14284#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to