#14270: Remove function call syntax for symbolic expressions
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
       Reporter:  ppurka                 |         Owner:  burcin               
   
           Type:  defect                 |        Status:  needs_work           
   
       Priority:  major                  |     Milestone:  sage-5.9             
   
      Component:  symbolics              |    Resolution:                       
   
       Keywords:                         |   Work issues:  fix 
combinat/tutorial.py
Report Upstream:  N/A                    |     Reviewers:                       
   
        Authors:  Punarbasu Purkayastha  |     Merged in:                       
   
   Dependencies:                         |      Stopgaps:                       
   
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 I'd also say that I think the prep tutorial one should still talk about
 this at some length, to explain (in the event this is done) ''why'' this
 doesn't work, because a lot of people will now and forevermore expect that
 it will work.  Similarly, most of these examples presumably should be
 moved to the new syntax, perhaps even with an explanatory remark as to
 exactly why that is the syntax.  For instance, how ''would'' one do the
 matrix example `h(x)` now?    We should be careful not to remove anything,
 just to change how it works to the appropriate way post-this-ticket.

 Rant I don't actually want to rehash any more, but put here for
 completeness:

     <rant>
     Because distinguishing between a function and a symbolic expression is
 an unnatural, CS-y thing to do; any symbolic expression is obviously a
 function of all variables in it, mathematically; for any function with
 more than one `var` I agree we don't want this (as indeed the example in
 the prep document points out) but for one-variable expressions (pace
 Jason, who will immediately ask whether `x+y-y` is one variable) it seems
 worth the potential for confusion...
     </rant>

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14270#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to