#14291: Orbits of tuples and sets
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: joyner
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: group theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:17 ncohen]:
> Helloooooooooooooo !!!
>
> Well, this does not solve the problem either Dima. In case of doubt
between an element (a,b,c) and the list of elements (a,b,c) it will return
the ELEMENT (a,b,c), but it it computes the orbit of a which happens to be
(a,b,c) then returning an ELEMENT (a,b,c) instead of the list (a,b,c) is a
mistake too `:-/`
>
This does not seem to present a problem, as the action of the group is the
same (trivial).
But the real problem is with tuples vs sets. E.g. if your domain has
tuples, it will not be possible to compute the action on subsets.
Can't you typify the domain elements somehow, so that they are recognised
as atoms without this kind of problem? (Or mangle them by some other
means...)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14291#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.