#14291: Orbits of tuples and sets
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen         |         Owner:  joyner      
           Type:  enhancement    |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-5.9    
      Component:  group theory   |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                 |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A            |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                 |      Stopgaps:              
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:21 ncohen]:
 > Yoooooooooooo !
 >
 > > this is too ugly, uglier than using a class, or whatever. Actually, I
 think it is simply wrong to let groups act on some totally unstructured
 arbitrary sh*t, and this is exactly what happens right now with allowing
 arbitrary domain elements, for which any relation to the original domain
 is lost.
 >
 > Ahahaha. Deal. Do I remove all support for labels on edges and vertices
 from graphs ? I am sooooooooooo eager to `:-P`
 I don't think this is relevant. Here we have an example of a group acting
 on triples, and this is a kind of "primitive" action, all the other
 actions originate from it.

 Anyhow, there is a hack which might fix all our sorrows: namely, add an
 extra level of () to the "most primitive" elements of the
 domain. I.e. if instead of {1,2,3,4,{1,2},{2,3}} there was a domain
 `{{1},{2},{3},{4},{1,2},{2,3}}` then the ambiguity does not arise, for
 {1,2} and `{{1},{2}}` are different things now.

 Dima

 >
 > > Say, if the domain of a group is {1,2,3,4,{1,2},{2,3}}, the very
 notion of the orbit of {1,2}  is becoming ambiguous, as in a sane world
 {1,2} is a subset of {1,2,3,4}, and not a random label.
 >
 > Well, in Sage however it is not ambiguous :
 > {{{
 > g.orbit(Set([1,2]),action="OnPoints")
 > g.orbit(Set([1,2]),action="OnSets")
 > }}}
 >
 > Nathann

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14291#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to