#13225: Check if lattices are upper/lower-semimodular and modular
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: csar | Owner:
sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.9
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Alex Csar, Kevin Dilks, Sangwook Kim | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Old description:
> Add is_upper_semimodular, is_lower_semimodular and is_modular to
> FiniteLatticePoset class.
>
> Changes _meet and _join in the HasseDiagram class to lazy attributes,
> fixing the problem that meets and joins failed to be defined for the dual
> of a lattice.
New description:
Add is_upper_semimodular, is_lower_semimodular and is_modular to
FiniteLatticePoset class.
Changes _meet and _join in the HasseDiagram class to lazy attributes,
fixing the problem that meets and joins failed to be defined for the dual
of a lattice.
Apply: [attachment:trac_13225
-add_upper_lower_semimodular_and_modular_for_lattices-csar-v2.patch]
--
Comment (by chapoton):
here is a rebased patch on 5.9.beta0
for the bot:
apply trac_13225-add_upper_lower_semimodular_and_modular_for_lattices-
csar-v2.patch
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13225#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
