#14406: Various prereq fixes
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer        |         Owner:  drkirkby    
           Type:  enhancement     |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.9    
      Component:  porting         |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                  |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                  |      Stopgaps:              
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by jpflori):

 Replying to [comment:9 leif]:
 > Didn't we want to replace the check for `sqrtl()` by a check for
 `?gammal()`?  (OTOH I don't recall why exactly... ;-) )
 >
 > Actually, we need both `sqrtl()` and `[lt]gammal()` unless we build
 Cephes, i.e., unless we're on Cygwin(?) or on FreeBSD, or skip the test
 because `SAGE_PORT` is set.
 We don't build Cephes on Cygwin.
 On Cygwin, the only *l functions actually needed anywhere in Sage and
 which caused troubles (and that Cygwin libm does not provide, not sure
 what it actually provides, but I seem to remember it provides no "long
 double" functions at all) was "logl" because of R, but we patched R so
 that its not needed anymore, and the next R upstream version provides a
 configure option to disable the use of "long double" functions anyway.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14406#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to