#13110: ComplexNumber should be able to accept the Python complex type
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner: jason, jkantor
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: complex, beginner | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
True, but it's the "natural" in between since python complex strings are
`2 + 2j` and I think a typical user is likely to try `2 + 2i` first.
However, if you feel strongly about it, I'll remove it since it is easier
to add functionality into sage than to remove it; and I'm 95% certain
there's a bug in my current implementation that I have to fix (it should
fail on `2 + -2*I`).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13110#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
