#14472: some elliptic curve functions over number fields fail over relative 
fields
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
       Reporter:  cremona                               |         Owner:  
cremona     
           Type:  defect                                |        Status:  
needs_review
       Priority:  major                                 |     Milestone:  
sage-5.10   
      Component:  elliptic curves                       |    Resolution:        
      
       Keywords:  elliptic curve relative number field  |   Work issues:        
      
Report Upstream:  N/A                                   |     Reviewers:        
      
        Authors:  John Cremona                          |     Merged in:        
      
   Dependencies:                                        |      Stopgaps:        
      
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------

Comment (by cremona):

 Replying to [comment:4 jdemeyer]:
 > All the examples seem to be ''quadratic'' number fields, is this
 intentional?

 No, probably just laziness.

 >
 > I don't know why Sage returns the basis of `ZK` like that, because it's
 not what PARI gives:
 > {{{
 > sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^2-5)
 > sage: K.integral_basis()
 > [1/2*a + 1/2, a]
 > sage: K._pari_integral_basis()
 > [1, 1/2*y - 1/2]
 > }}}
 >

 Well spotted.  The integral_basis method calls maximal_order which does
 call _pari_integral_basis, but then applies some Order constructor to the
 generators (order.absolute_order_from_module_generators) which is where
 this non-canonical ( to my mind) basis comes from.  If that is to be
 chaned for quadratic fields then that would be a separate ticket, and
 would surely have a lot of doctest output consequences.

 > As for reducing an element modulo an ideal (which is what you do here),
 you could use PARI's `nfeltreduce()`.

 Sure, but here we are only reducing modulo (2) or (3) so it seemed easier
 to do it manually.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14472#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to