#14501: Fix memory allocation problems in data_structures_pyx.pxi
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dcoudert       |         Owner:  joyner      
           Type:  defect         |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-5.10   
      Component:  group theory   |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                 |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A            |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  David Coudert  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                 |      Stopgaps:              
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Old description:

> The following test causes a segfault on my computer (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
> W3520 @ 2.67GHz / 4GB ram / linux)
> {{{
> sage: G = graphs.CompleteGraph(10)
> sage: GG = G.line_graph().line_graph().line_graph()
> sage: H = GG.relabel(inplace=False)
> sage: GG.is_isomorphic(H)
> ...
> sage: line 135:  3438 Segmentation fault      (core dumped)
> "$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/bin/sage" "$@"
> }}}
> Tracking the segfault, I ended up in the {{{SC_new}}} of
> {{{sage/groups/perm_gps/partn_ref/data_structures_pyx.pxi}}}
>
> This patch fix some assignments performed before testing memory
> allocations and other similar stuff, but does not fix my problem.

New description:

 The following test causes a segfault on my computer (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
 W3520 @ 2.67GHz / 4GB ram / linux)
 {{{
 sage: G = graphs.CompleteGraph(10)
 sage: GG = G.line_graph().line_graph().line_graph()
 sage: H = GG.relabel(inplace=False)
 sage: GG.is_isomorphic(H)
 ...
 sage: line 135:  3438 Segmentation fault      (core dumped)
 "$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/bin/sage" "$@"
 }}}
 Tracking the segfault, I ended up in the {{{SC_new}}} of
 {{{sage/groups/perm_gps/partn_ref/data_structures_pyx.pxi}}}

 This patch fix some assignments performed before testing memory
 allocations and other similar stuff, but does not fix my problem.

 Apply:
 * trac_14501.2.patch

--

Comment (by dcoudert):

 > Moving the two assignment can avoid a segfault alright,
 Yes

 > replacing a malloc by a calloc is unnecessary unless proven otherwise,

 Proof: With malloc, C allocates a contiguous segment of memory. However,
 this block ''is not initialized''! type "man malloc" in your terminal of
 go to http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/malloc.3.html.
 With calloc, the memory is initialized to 0 or NULL. \qed

 In any case, it is always safer to ensure that variables are initialized.


 > and splitting a loop into two may also be unnecessary if the two vectors
 are only allocated together (and checked at that time).
 Ok.

 -----
 I forgot to tick "replace" while uploading update patch.

 Apply:  trac_14501.2.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14501#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to