#14502: Improvements of hyperbolicity procedures
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: dcoudert | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: David Coudert | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Well, before it was wrong because the approximation given by "cuts+" was
wrong (additive_gap and approximation_factor were forwarded to the
subcall), and now it is still wrong for you can still use additive_gap to
get a +20 approximation even though you use "cuts+". Actually, the user
should have no way to know that the decomposition method yields a +1
approximation, for as far as he is concerned the only difference that
cuts+ has with the normal method is that with cuts+ he cannot use
approximation_factor.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14502#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
