#14502: Improvements of hyperbolicity procedures
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: dcoudert | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: David Coudert | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> For additive gap I agree and I can add it. But for the multiplicative
gap, I don't know how to change the parameter. If one asks for a
2-approximation, he will not be satisfied with a 2*OPT+1 approx. Any
proposal?
None. But an exception has to be raised in this case. Or anything to tell
the user that when he asks for a 2-approx, the exact number will be
computed and so may take muuuuuch longer than he expected.
As it is just a reason for slowness, and not for wrong results, it can
just stay as a comment in the documentation of `cuts+` if you want.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14502#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
