#14527: chromatic_polynomial - fixed memory leak and added new test cases
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment (by azi):
Replying to [comment:8 ncohen]:
> > Interesting. What is the reason for switching to Git? Its because
Linus uses it right???
>
> From my point of view, it is because some Sage developpers think that it
is great. And I've been contaminated by their enthusiasm, even though I
barely used it `:-P`
>
> > Nonono not this! I was asking about the code that you guys were doing
that allows *contracting* an edge of a graph. I am not sure this thing was
accepted yet?
>
> Oh. I don't know where it stands. I hate that patch. But honestly, if
you want efficient code, rewrite your own. It is not a long code anyway.
Yes but I just wanted to quickly test something and not bother writing an
edge contraction routine :-/ Do you happen to be able to extract that
quickly from the patch or something? I just need to be able to contract an
edge of a graph (ignoring loops & multiple edges)
>
> Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14527#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
