#14528: Additional doctests for the graph module
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner: tbd
Type: PLEASE CHANGE | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hellooooooooooooo !!
> Yes correct. I am making this random mistakes all the time. Your
suggestion for is_perfect makes sense in this case. Though I think it
still covers only a small % of input graphs.
Agreed. Though I really have no idea what someone who has a use for this
method will run it on.
> Yeah! I think it *should* not be that hard to implement but I don't
think anyone is really using this test that much...
Agreed too. But at this level, we mostly code algorithms for our own
pleasure, even if sometimes, much later, some guys comes up saying that it
helped him.
I spent a crazy amount of time writing #14562 and I really have no use for
it `:-P`
> PS. I have updated the patch, could you please check if its fine with
you?
Immediately !
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14528#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
