#14056: Distance matrix
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> Oookay now I think I *do* understand you. Somehow I still like it more
the way it is structured now (an algorithmically inclined guy would look
for the distance_all_pairs method) a math guy for the distance matrix and
since we already have the distance_all_pairs method I don't see any good
reasons for removing it.
>
> That said, why would you like this specific change?
Hmmmmmm... Because we already have far too much functions in the Graph
classes to have aliases.
But you convinced me anyway. Let's forget it !
> Hahaha. No worries, I am also quite tense (GSOC is building unnecessary
pressure :S).
Ahahaha. Well, there's nothing to do before the 27th of May, is there ?
`;-)`
> I can hardly imagining you writing unpleasant emails btw :-)
Ahahahahahah `:-D`
Half of the world can't, indeed. The other half can't picture me as doing
anything else but waste their time. Usually, those are my colleagues `:-P`
Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnn !!
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14056#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
