#8392: Implement RSK for generalized permutations
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: nborie | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: permutation, check, days38, days45 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Merged in:
Dependencies: #6495 #13605 #8703 #14459 #14319 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by jferreira):
Travis -
A couple quick comments on the documentation:
In the docstring for sage.combinat.rsk.RSK:
- In the first paragraph "as known as two-line..." should be "also known
as two-line..." ?
-In your description of the algorithm p and q are first referenced as your
insertion and recording tableaux and then they become P and Q in the next
paragraph and in this paragraph p appears to be a generalized permutation.
In the docstring for sage.combinat.rsk.RSK_inverse:
- I think you forgot a colon at the end of the sentence beginning "Same
for Edelman-Greene ..."
Haven't played with the functions yet (except for your examples), but plan
to soon.
-Jeff[[BR]]
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8392#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
