#8392: Implement RSK for generalized permutations
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: nborie | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: permutation, check, days38, days45 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Merged in:
Dependencies: #6495 #13605 #8703 #14459 #14319 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by jferreira):
Travis,
Can you add some more checks for invalid input? For example there is no
problem doing this:
{{{
sage: RSK([1],[1,2]) # Words are different length
sage: RSK([2,1],[1,1]) # Not a generalized permutation
}}}
I am using the definition of generalized permutation in Stanley EC2
Chapter 7.
- Jeff
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8392#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
