#9970: Flaky doctest in sage/interfaces/r.py
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: doctest coverage | Resolution:
Keywords: r | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Willem Jan Palenstijn | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:21 wjp]:
> Unrelated as far as I can tell.
OK, then the ticket status should probably reverted (it has been "needs
work").
In any case, it seems that #12876 needs this change to make the doctest
failure vanish. I suggest that a "todo" is added, referring to this
ticket, stating that the doctest fix from #12876 is not a fix of the
underlying problem, which is dealt with here.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9970#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
