#14249: There should be no need to have _an_element_ implement to multiply 
elements
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing   |         Owner:  robertwb        
           Type:  defect      |        Status:  positive_review 
       Priority:  major       |     Milestone:  sage-5.10       
      Component:  coercion    |    Resolution:                  
       Keywords:              |   Work issues:                  
Report Upstream:  N/A         |     Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
        Authors:  Simon King  |     Merged in:                  
   Dependencies:  #14264      |      Stopgaps:                  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):

  * status:  needs_work => positive_review


Comment:

 I hope double back ticks do the trick (I only changed single into double
 back tick, so, I hope I can directly revert to "positive_review")

 Apply trac_14249-coercion_without_an_element.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14249#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to