#12949: Better congruence testing for odd arithmetic subgroups
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: craigcitro
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.11
Component: modular forms | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues: bring back old code + minor
doc
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
Authors: David Loeffler | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* reviewer: => Vincent Delecroix
* work_issues: => bring back old code + minor doc
* milestone: sage-5.10 => sage-5.11
Comment:
I would prefer to keep both implementations (naive one vs checking
relations with default to the latter one of course ;-). Then you may add a
dedicated test comparing the results in `sage.modular.arithgroup.tests`.
Otherwise the new implementation is well documented and everything works.
Is your result available to read ? A dissertation is a legitimate
reference, but one may want to read it.
Why did you remove the reference of the article of Alexey G. Gorinov ? I
do not claim that it is not a good idea but just that it was not the
purpose of the ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12949#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
