#12848: Bug in order_ideal_complement_generators: 'down'
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery                               |         Owner:  
sage-combinat
           Type:  defect                                |        Status:  
needs_review 
       Priority:  major                                 |     Milestone:  
sage-5.10    
      Component:  combinatorics                         |    Resolution:        
       
       Keywords:  posets                                |   Work issues:        
       
Report Upstream:  N/A                                   |     Reviewers:        
       
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry, Frédéric Chapoton  |     Merged in:        
       
   Dependencies:                                        |      Stopgaps:        
       
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Hi Frederic.

 I agree that this naming thing is a pain; which is actually what
 stopped me from cleaning this earlier. Thanks for pushing it forward ...

 order_ideal and order_filter are definitely bad for the reason you
 mention (which one is up, which one is down). So at least this is
 settled: we want to move away from those.

 upper_set and lower_set has the advantage of being unambiguous and
 relatively clear (though I see your point about "closures"). So I
 would vote for this.  But ...  we also would want to be able to pass
 upper/lower as argument, and I agree that ``set(dir="up")`` really
 does not make sense :-) And ``upper_set(dir='down') is not great
 either.

 I am really not keen with "ideal" because it has two conflicting
 meanings. But it's been in Sage for a while and we already do
 ideal(side="left/right") in rings/monoids, so ideal(dir="up/down") is
 consistent.

 Would we have a nice method name for the other definition of ideal
 (e.g. a upper set such that any meet of two elements is also in it)?

 Cheers,
                                  Nicolas

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12848#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to