#12848: Bug in order_ideal_complement_generators: 'down'
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: posets | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry, Frédéric Chapoton | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Comment (by chapoton):
Here is new patch, with correct header.
I have chosen to do the following:
- keep the names "order_ideal" and "order_filter" for backward
compatibility
- introduce "upper_set" and "lower_set" as aliases
- use the names "ideal_of_subset" and "ideals_of_subsets" for generic
cases
This is clearly not at all coherent. Should we try to reach coherence in
this ticket, or should we rather use this ticket to solve the issue that
has been raised ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12848#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
