#12922: Implicit derivative
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: mmarco | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: implicit derivative | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Miguel Marco | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by burcin):
Before this gets switched to positive review, we should check how it
behaves if there already is a symbolic function defined with a custom
method for evaluation named `y` or `f`.
Why is this not a method of symbolic expressions? Isn't it inconsistent to
have the functional notation supported but not a class method?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12922#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
