#14636: ECL spkg : dirty workarounds?
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Snark | Owner: jdemeyer
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-pending
Component: packages: standard | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues: rebase, SIGCHLD doctest
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Julien Puydt | Merged in:
Dependencies: #11359 | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
Two comments that might be useful:
- When I figured out the original formula, I used trial and error and a
bit of reading documentation. I found something that worked and didn't
look like it was using any illegal hacks, I was happy. The new formula
looks fine in that respect too, so if it works use it!
- The `.fasb` files were used by ADSF to avoid overwriting files produced
by ECL's native build routines. As far as I could see the format is the
same as the `.fas` files. I did the rename to ensure that {{{(require
`maxima)}}} would work without first doing {{{(require `asdf)}}} (which
was necessary for recognising what to do with `.fasb` files). Since ASDF
is getting more closely integrated into ECL, you may be able to modify or
avoid this renaming step.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14636#comment:43>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
