#5831: [with patch, needs review] reducible root system fixes
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: bump | Owner: bump
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-combinat
Component: combinatorics | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by nthiery):
> Replying to the last message, I think it is necessary to implement
simple_roots (and also simple_coroots and fundamental_weights).
Oops, sorry for the confusion. I was wondering wether it was necessary to
implement the simple *coroots*.
For the roots, definitely yes.
> Nicolas requested a doctest. See:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-
devel/msg/4004c4a8471f3cfa?hl=en&pli=1
> I did this. I put the new doctest in type_reducible.py.
Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5831#comment:5>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
