#14136: P-partition enumerators in QSym
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_info
Priority: minor | Milestone:
sage-5.11
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: QSym, P-partitions, posets, days45 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: darij | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by strogdon):
This is somewhat non-intuitive but the following seems to work
{{{
sage: import warnings
sage: warnings.simplefilter('error', DeprecationWarning)
sage: import functools
sage: def f(x, y): return x^y
sage: g = functools.partial(f, 2, 3)
sage: g()
8
sage: class mypartial(functools.partial):
....: def __init__(self, f, i, j):
....: functools.partial.__init__(self)
....:
sage: g = mypartial(f, 2, 3)
sage: g()
8
}}}
or
{{{
sage: class mynewpartial(functools.partial):
....: def __init__(self, f, i, j):
....: super(mynewpartial, self).__init__()
....:
sage: g = mynewpartial(f, 2, 3)
sage: g()
8
}}}
This perhaps suggests the {{{__init__}}} method of the {{{BoundClass}}}
should be
{{{
def __init__(self, *args):
super(BoundClass, self).__init__()
self.__doc__ = self.func.__doc__
}}}
instead of
{{{
super(BoundClass, self).__init__(*args)
}}}
I don't know whether this breaks anything?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14136#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
