#10358: New interface with OEIS
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tmonteil
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.11
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: Cernay2012 days49 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Thierry Monteil | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Just a brief question - why the `oeis()` rather than `sloane_find()`? Are
you just completely replacing the sloane.py? I just don't quite get why
this isn't just all put in sloane.py, and perhaps the new code replacing
the broken code... Not that I have a vested interest in this.
I do recommend that all references to `is broken for more than a year` be
changed to `is broken` or perhaps `has been broken for some time`.
Also, it would be nice to have references like
{{{
class:`sage.databases.oeis.OEIS`_
}}}
or whatever the correct format is.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10358#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
