#14823: Categories of (C)DVR and (C)DVF
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: caruso | Owner: nthiery
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: categories, DVR | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Xavier Caruso | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by caruso):
* status: needs_work => needs_info
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 roed]:
> * There are test failures to fix but they look simple.
Fixed.
> * Rather than `@abstract_method` you should use the `required_methods`
function from `sage.categories.Category`. Most of the functions on these
categories should not actually be implemented on the category but rather
included in the output of `required_methods`.
cf Nicolas' answer: I think that the "right way" is to decorate these
functions by `@abstract_method`, so that they are automatically discovered
by `required_methods`.
> * In power series rings it's probably worth giving some examples with
infinite precision to highlight the difference with p-adic rings.
I don't understand what you are saying: do you mean that I should add some
doctests in `sage.rings.power_series_ring` and
`sage.rings.power_series_ring_element` to highlight this difference?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14823#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
