#14846: CycleIndexSeries derivative, integral, exponential methods are not
combinatorial
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: agd | Owner: agd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by agd):
I have uploaded a new version of the patch which makes a small change:
rather than building the terms of the ''derivative'' of a
''CycleIndexSeries'' using an opaque list concatenation, I have used the
''CycleIndexSeriesRing.term'' method.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14846#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
