#14950: finish cleaup in sage/combinat/design
------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: niles | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Keywords:
Merged in: | Authors:
Reviewers: | Report Upstream: N/A
Work issues: | Branch:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------+-----------------------
The changes in #14499 introduce some failures in optional doctests. The
first one should be checked and fixed; the other two come from deprecation
warnings.
{{{
$sage -t --long --optional=sage,gap_packages
sage/combinat/designs/design_catalog.py
**********************************************************************
File "sage/combinat/designs/design_catalog.py", line 8, in
sage.combinat.designs.design_catalog
Failed example:
designs.WittDesign(24) # optional - gap_packages
Expected nothing
Got:
Incidence structure with 24 points and 759 blocks
**********************************************************************
}}}
{{{
$ sage -t --long --optional=sage,gap_packages
sage/combinat/designs/incidence_structures.py
**********************************************************************
File "sage/combinat/designs/incidence_structures.py", line 528, in
sage.combinat.designs.incidence_structures.IncidenceStructure.is_block_design
Failed example:
BD = WittDesign(9) # optional - gap_packages (design package)
Expected nothing
Got:
doctest:1: DeprecationWarning: This method soon will not be available
in that way anymore. To use it, you can now call it by typing
designs.WittDesign
See http://trac.sagemath.org/14499 for details.
**********************************************************************
File "sage/combinat/designs/incidence_structures.py", line 626, in
sage.combinat.designs.incidence_structures.IncidenceStructure.points_from_gap
Failed example:
BD.points_from_gap() # optional - gap_packages (design package)
Expected:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
Got:
doctest:1: DeprecationWarning: Unless somebody protests this method
will be removed, as nobody seems to know why it is there.
See http://trac.sagemath.org/14499 for details.
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
**********************************************************************
}}}
p.s. Without the deprecation warning, I would have had a tough time
figuring out where the first failure was coming from. Thanks for the
hint!!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14950>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
