#14234: Restructuring Diagram/Partition Algebras to match category structure
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: ghseeli | Owner:
Type: enhancement | AlexGhitza
Priority: minor | Status:
Component: algebra | needs_review
Keywords: Partition algebra, diagram | Milestone:
algebra, days38, days40 | sage-5.11
Authors: ghseeli, s.r.doty, alauve | Resolution:
Report Upstream: N/A | Merged in:
Branch: | Reviewers: Travis
Stopgaps: | Scrimshaw
| Work issues:
| Dependencies:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* status: new => needs_review
* reviewer: => Travis Scrimshaw
Comment:
I've set the ticket to needs_review and I'll write a review patch. I would
like to know if there is a better name than `IdealAlgebra` since that is
somewhat misleading (perhaps something that does not begin with `Ideal`
such as `PartitionIdealAlgebra`)? Also, you'll need to fill in your real
names as the authors.
Thank you,[[BR]]
Travis
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14234#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
