#14912: UniqueRepresentation tutorial could use more love
--------------------------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: documentation, structure | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
--------------------------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:7 SimonKing]:
> Certainly it is a severe fault that `GF(...)` appears as example of
`UniqueRepresentation`.
Or not? I now see that `GF(...)` appears in order to demonstrate the
design pattern that is common to both unique representation and unique
factory. And it is clearly stated that one would like to have something
like
{{{
isinstance(GF(p), GF)
}}}
which is ''not'' possible with a unique factory but is the case for
`UniqueRepresentation`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14912#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
