#14912: UniqueRepresentation tutorial could use more love
--------------------------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: documentation, structure | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
--------------------------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
I think it is a good idea to have GF mentioned ''both'' in the
documentation of unique representation and unique factory, since it
explains one detail one can base one's choice on.
Namely, as an example of a behaviour one can not get with
`UniqueRepresentation`:
{{{
sage: type(GF(5))
<class
'sage.rings.finite_rings.finite_field_prime_modn.FiniteField_prime_modn_with_category'>
sage: type(GF(25,'x'))
<class
'sage.rings.finite_rings.finite_field_givaro.FiniteField_givaro_with_category'>
sage: type(GF(5^10,'x'))
<class
'sage.rings.finite_rings.finite_field_ext_pari.FiniteField_ext_pari_with_category'>
sage: type(GF(2^20,'x'))
<class
'sage.rings.finite_rings.finite_field_ntl_gf2e.FiniteField_ntl_gf2e_with_category'>
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14912#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
