#14982: Coercion from rings with coerce_embedding into constructions over those
rings is broken
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mmezzarobba | Owner:
Type: defect | Status:
Priority: major | needs_review
Component: coercion | Milestone: sage-6.0
Keywords: embedding | Resolution:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Merged in:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Branch: | Work issues:
u/mmezzarobba/coerce_embeddings | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:3 mmezzarobba]:
> Here's an attempt to fix the problem with a small change to the coercion
discovery algorithm. It does break a few things, but I'd argue it only
does so by exposing weaknesses in existing code. The other patches in the
series fix (or, in one case, work around) these weaknesses.
>
> See the commit messages for details.
>
> What do the experts say?
I couldn't tell, unless you give me a pointer to the new workfow. What do
I need to do, when not a patch but a brunch (aaahm, branch...) is given?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14982#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
