#15100: ipython unnecessarily relies on sage-location
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: felixs | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.0
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Felix Salfelder | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/felixs/ipython | 9c372862bc86c6aa09b9fbf94711405d716abff7
Dependencies: #15146 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by felixs):
Replying to [comment:14 jdemeyer]:
> > there is no point in requiring this mechanism
> Depends what you mean. The path-rewriting is needed to be able to
relocate the Sage install tree.
What i mean is, there is no point in requiring the mechanism for
`ipython`. Most (maybe not all) cases are like this.
> Let me repeat this: By special-casing `ipython` you are achieving
absolutely nothing: the "hack" in `sage-location` still exists and you're
just fooling the doctest.
there's a proper doctest in #15146, that does not rely on a wrong ipython
installation.
> A proper fix for the "hack" would fix all Python scripts, not just this
one.
Yes.
> What's the point of this special case?
I cannot fix all at once. But before the line has been merged, I will
certainly not paste it into the other `spkg-install` files.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15100#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.