#15071: Make it easy to have automatic numerical evaluation of symbolic
functions
on inexact input
-------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by benjaminfjones):
It looks like now, only the second branch (the else) is being tested. Can
we add the original test you had as well as the new one?
About the `AttributeError` issue, what you propose sounds reasonable to
me, but it excludes the possibility of getting a test in the codebase
(since the other ticket wouldn't get to include a patch). Since excepting
the error is done here I think it's probably okay to include a test as an
"aside". What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15071#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
